Capture
Full page, visible screen, selected area, selected element or responsive viewport.
Document what was tested, where the defect appeared and whether the fix worked. Capture full pages, selected areas, elements or responsive layouts, preserve page and viewport context, annotate the exact defect and compare the corrected state.
A faster QA handoff
Capture focuses on visual evidence. It does not currently claim automatic console or network-log collection.
Full page, visible screen, selected area, selected element or responsive viewport.
Mark the problem with arrows, boxes, text, highlights and numbered callouts.
Keep URL, page title, viewport dimensions, capture mode and browser information with the evidence.
Compare Before and After or highlight changed visual regions after a fix.
Export one screenshot or an entire project as a structured review report or professional PDF.
Visual QA toolkit
Screenshot evidence becomes much more useful when the affected state, exact viewport and review note stay together.
Capture long webpages from top to bottom instead of attaching several disconnected viewport images.
Capture desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile and custom viewport widths so layout defects are documented at the right breakpoint.
Store URL, page title, date/time, viewport dimensions, browser information, DPR and capture mode with the screenshot.
Use numbered callouts with title, review note and priority to keep each visual defect structured.
Place old and new versions side by side or use a reveal slider to check whether a fix actually changed the right area.
Highlight meaningful changed regions and create evidence for visual regression review.
Developer-ready visual evidence
Capture keeps the marked screenshot together with useful environment context and review notes, helping reduce the back-and-forth that happens when a developer receives only a cropped image with no page or viewport information.
Normal capture, annotation, comparison and report preparation are designed to happen locally. Screenshot image content does not need to be uploaded to RATdeck for those workflows. Account and subscription communication is separate.
Built for testing teams
Document spacing, overflow, missing assets, responsive defects, broken visual states and inconsistent UI with exact screenshots.
Capture the screen state, mark what failed acceptance and export a review report stakeholders can understand.
Give developers the screenshot, page context, viewport and annotated issue instead of vague chat messages.
Compare an earlier capture with a new build and inspect changed regions after implementation.
Reproduce visual issues at desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile or a custom viewport width.
Combine several screenshots from one project into a professional PDF with notes, priorities and optional metadata.
QA screenshot and bug report workflow
Current browser QA tools increasingly combine screenshots with browser context, annotations and structured reports because a visual defect is easier to fix when developers know exactly what page, viewport and state produced the problem. Capture focuses on that visual evidence layer: high-quality webpage screenshots, responsive capture, annotations, callouts, metadata, comparison and professional export.
For teams that specifically need automatic console logs, network traces or session recording, Capture does not currently claim those capabilities. Its strength is clean visual evidence and review documentation without forcing the screenshot image into a cloud workflow.
QA screenshot FAQ
A QA screenshot tool helps testers capture the exact visual problem, annotate the defect, preserve useful page and viewport context and hand the evidence to a developer or product team.
Yes. Capture can take full-page, visible-screen, selected-area, selected-element and responsive screenshots, then add arrows, shapes, text, highlights, callouts, blur or pixelation.
No. Capture currently focuses on visual QA evidence. It does not currently claim automatic console logs, network traces or session recording.
Yes. Capture Metadata can store the URL, page title, date/time, viewport dimensions, browser information, DPR and capture mode. Metadata can optionally appear in reports and presentations.
Yes. Pro includes Before / After comparison, reveal slider, side-by-side review and visual difference detection.
Yes. Multi-screenshot Review Reports can combine several captures from one project and preserve their own annotations, notes, priorities and optional metadata.
Normal capture, annotation, comparison and report preparation are designed to stay on your computer. Screenshot image content does not need to be uploaded to RATdeck for those workflows.
Capture by RATdeck
Capture, annotate, compare and report website issues while keeping screenshot processing local.
Responsive & Visual Testing